🔍 Read the full analysis: What’s At Stake In Indonesia’s AI Copyright Bill Fight? on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on tech for your team
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
Google, Meta and TikTok objected to parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11, 2026. The draft addresses payments for news links and previews, AI training on copyrighted material, and rules for AI-assisted works, but its current text and a vote date remain unclear.
Google, Meta and TikTok challenged parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law overhaul at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11, 2026, as lawmakers consider rules covering payments for news content and the use of copyrighted works to train artificial intelligence. The bill is still under deliberation; it has not become law, and the full text currently under discussion was not available.
The revision would amend Law No. 28 of 2014, Indonesia’s copyright law. Parliament adopted it as an initiative in a plenary session on March 12, 2026, and its Legislation Body, known as Baleg, is now discussing it with the government. At the Nov. 11 hearing, Baleg heard from the three technology companies, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia, according to Kompas.
The proposals described in reporting on earlier drafts include requiring platforms to compensate news publishers when they aggregate, republish or display news, including in link previews. The draft would also address AI training on copyrighted material, disclosure of AI use, protection for works made with AI assistance, and imitation of a creator’s distinctive style. The July draft described by Reuters proposed licensing or fair-use provisions for AI training and possible sanctions for platforms that do not comply. That draft is not necessarily the text now before lawmakers.
At the hearing, Google opposed payment duties for indexing and displaying news, a single collective licensing body and mandatory licenses for AI training data, according to reports by Suara and Kompas. It argued that links are not republication and sought continued safe-harbor protections for platforms. Meta also said that sharing a link is not republishing and warned that payment requirements could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue. TikTok argued that AI disclosure should not apply when AI is used only as an assistive tool, and also called for safe-harbor protection.
What’s at stake in Indonesia’s AI copyright bill fight?
Google, Meta and TikTok challenged parts of a proposed copyright law revision. Its current wording and vote date remain unclear.
What the proposal could cover
Reported drafts span news distribution and creative work, but the text being discussed may have changed.
Payments for links
Platforms could face compensation duties for aggregating, republishing or displaying news, including previews.
Access to copyrighted work
Licensing or exceptions could shape how developers use copyrighted material to train AI.
Disclosure and protection
Reported drafts address AI disclosure, AI-assisted works and imitation of a creator’s distinctive style.
What the companies challenged
At the hearing, each company raised concerns about provisions described in reporting.
| Company | Reported position |
|---|---|
| Opposed payment duties for indexing and displaying news, a single licensing body and mandatory AI training licenses; sought safe harbor. | |
| Meta | Argued links are not republication and warned payments could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue. |
| TikTok | Argued disclosure should not apply when AI is only assistive; called for safe harbor. |
Where the process stands
The proposal is still under discussion by lawmakers and the government.
The revision was adopted as an initiative in March 2026.
The Legislation Body is discussing the proposal with the government and heard from platforms, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia.
A settled version, revisions and any vote timetable have yet to be announced.
Key uncertainties
The full current draft was not available, so reported provisions are not confirmed final terms.
- How compensation would be calculated and distributed
- Which links, previews and AI training uses would be covered
- How disclosure and human contribution would be defined
- Publication or clarification of the current text
- Changes to licensing and platform liability
- Any announced parliamentary vote date
Who Pays for News and AI Training
The bill could reshape how publishers earn from online distribution and how platforms handle news links in Indonesia. If the proposal makes platforms pay for displaying or aggregating news, it could create a new source of compensation for publishers. The companies, however, contend that payments for links could lead them to limit how they index or share local news, potentially changing how readers find reporting online. Those are company arguments, not established outcomes.
The AI provisions could affect developers, creators and rights holders beyond the news industry. Licensing requirements or exceptions for training data would determine what access AI developers have to copyrighted material. Rules on disclosure, human contribution and style imitation could also affect how creators use AI and how their work is identified and protected. The proposal’s scope across areas such as journalism, photography, film, games and software means its eventual wording could have broad consequences, though the current draft’s details are not confirmed.
The dispute also concerns how compensation would be distributed. The proposal described in July reporting would route payments through state-supervised collective management organisations. Google objected to requiring rights holders to use a single body, saying voluntary, market-based agreements would be preferable. How any system would set rates, identify eligible works and distribute funds remains unresolved in the available reporting.
Products Worth Considering
Jackery Solar Generator 1000 v2 with Two 100W Solar Panels, 1024Wh LiFePO4 Battery
Samsung 37-inch Odyssey G7 Curved 4K UHD Gaming Monitor (G75F)
DJI Mini 5 Pro Fly More Combo with DJI RC 2
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A 2014 Law Faces AI Questions
The bill is a proposed revision to a law adopted before the current wave of generative AI tools. In July 2026, Reuters reported on a draft that would explicitly address AI in copyright law. Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry official overseeing intellectual property, confirmed that draft was authentic but said it was not final. He described generative AI as a disruption to the copyright framework. The draft’s provisions may have changed since then.
Indonesia already has a rule concerning platforms and journalism: Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024 requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. At the November hearing, Press Council deputy chair Totok Suryanto said the regulation had not worked as intended and that platform compliance was low, according to Aktual. The Press Council also told lawmakers that platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent. Those figures were presented by the council; the materials available do not independently establish their measurement basis.
The draft’s provisions have been reported from different versions. Google referred to Articles 29 and 30 at the hearing, but the full text under discussion could not be obtained, and article numbers and wording should be treated as provisional. The July draft reported by Reuters is useful background, not confirmation of the current bill’s exact terms.
“No choice”
— Google representative at the Nov. 11 hearing, as reported by Reuters
The Current Draft Is Not Public
The exact wording lawmakers are considering remains unclear. The full current text was not available, reports have cited different versions, and the proposed provisions may have changed since the July draft. It is also not clear how the bill would define sufficient human involvement in AI-assisted work, determine when AI use must be disclosed, or distinguish imitation of a protected style from other uses.
Other unresolved questions include how any payment system would calculate compensation, whether every news link or preview would be covered, and what exceptions would apply to AI training. Companies’ predictions that the rules could reduce access to news or make AI development unworkable are arguments made in the debate, not demonstrated consequences. No vote date was announced in the supplied reporting.
Lawmakers Continue Baleg Deliberations
Baleg is expected to continue discussing the proposal with the government after hearing from platforms, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia. The next key development will be the publication or clarification of the version being considered, followed by any revisions and a parliamentary decision on whether and when to bring it to a vote.
Until lawmakers release a settled text or announce a timetable, the July provisions should not be treated as final policy. Readers should watch for updates on the bill’s licensing approach, platform liability, AI-training rules and any changes to the proposed treatment of links and news previews.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the AI copyright bill?
No. The proposal is still being discussed by parliament’s Legislation Body and the government. No vote date was announced in the available reporting.
What would the bill change?
Reported drafts address compensation when platforms display or aggregate news, as well as copyright rules for AI training, disclosure of AI use, AI-assisted works and imitation of creators’ styles. The full current text is not available, so the final provisions remain uncertain.
Why are Google, Meta and TikTok objecting?
The companies have challenged proposed payment duties for links and news previews, aspects of licensing and platform liability, and some AI rules. Their concerns include possible effects on news access, publisher traffic and AI training; these are their claims about potential consequences.
What do Indonesian publishers and the Press Council say?
The Press Council has argued that platforms should contribute more to journalism. It told lawmakers that platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent. Those figures are the council’s statements, and the source material does not give their measurement basis.
When will the bill be decided?
No vote date has been announced in the available reporting. Baleg and the government are still deliberating, and the timing will depend on further discussions and any revisions.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
